Dismissed¶31

Surendra Sahu @ Golu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC21 Apr 2025CRMP/127/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; CRMP 127 of 2024; quashing of FIR; FIR No.64/2024? No — FIR No.64/2023, PS Nawagarh, Janjgir-Champa; Sections 498A, 506 read with 34 IPC; cruelty/matrimonial dispute; charge sheet No.72/2023 dated 05.04.2023; order framing charge dated 03.11.2023; Criminal Case No.95/2023; JMFC Nawagarh; trial in progress, 4th of 8 prosecution witnesses; petition dismissed 22/04/2025; Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice; Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge; petitioners Surendra Sahu @ Golu and family; complainant Vineeta Sahu.

What did the court decide?

None; the prayer to quash the FIR, charge sheet, order framing charge and criminal case proceedings was refused and the trial was left to continue. ¶31

Surendra Sahu @ Golu Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Dowry and Cruelty | Chhattisgarh HC (2025)

1 / 3

2025:CGHC:18090-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

CRMP No. 127 of 2024

¶6

1 - Surendra Sahu @ Golu S/o Lachhiram Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Udela, Police Station Simga, District BalodabazarBhatapara, CG, Presently Posted As Hostel Superintendent At Govt. Pre Metric Three Unit Tribal Boys Hostel, Jarhabhatha, Bilaspur, C.G.

¶7

2 - Lachhiram Sahu S/o Motiram Sahu Aged About 72 Years

¶8

3 - Parvati Sahu W/o Lachhiram Sahu Aged About 65 Years

¶9

Petitioners No.2 and 3 are residents of Village Sargipal, Kondagaon, Police Station Kondagaon, District Kondagaon, CG

¶10

4 - Himanshu Sahu S/o Anil Kumar Sahu Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Sargipal, Kondagaon, Police Station Kondagaon, District Kondagaon, CG, Presently R/o Ware House Road, Behind Civil Court, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur, CG

¶11

5 - Ramkishore Sahu S/o Ghanshyam Prasad Sahu Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Tilda Newra, Police Station Raipur, District Raipur, CG, Posted As Head Constable At Police Station Tilda- Newra, Tehsil Tilda, District Raipur, CG

¶12

6 - Ramprakash Sahu S/o Ghashyam Prasad Sahu Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Kapasda, Police Station Dharsivan, District Raipur, CG, Posted As Patwari At Patwari Halka No. 7, Siliyari, Revenue Circle Siliyari, Sub-Tehsil Saragaon, Tehsil Dharsiva, District Raipur, CG (Accused)

¶13

... Petitioners

¶14

versus

¶15

ASHUTOSHMISHRA Digitallysigned byASHUTOSHMISHRADate:2025.04.2415:27:33+0530

¶16

2 / 3

¶17

1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The S.H.O. , Police Station Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa, C.G. (Prosecution) 2 - Smt. Vineeta Sahu D/o Mekaldas Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Nawagarh, Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, CG (Complainant)

¶18

	... Respondents
For Petitioners	: Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate
For Respondent No.1/State	: Mr. Hari Om Rai, Panel Lawyer
For Respondent No.2	: Mr. Vinay Nagdev, Advocate
	through video conferencing.

¶19

Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge

¶20

Order on Board

¶21

Per, Ramesh Sinha, C.J.

¶22

22/04/2025

¶23

Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing.

¶24

Heard Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Hari Om Rai, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/Respondent No.1 and Mr. Vinay Nagdev, Advocate for Respondent No.2, through video conferencing.

¶25

The instant CRMP has been filed with the following relief:-

¶26

“It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the FIR bearing No.64/2023 registered at Police Station Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa, CG. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A, 506 read with 34 of IPC, consequent Charge Sheet bearing No.72/2023 dated 05.04.2023 emanating from the aforesaid FIR, order framing charge passed on 03.11.2023 and the proceedings of Criminal Case No.95/2023 parties being ‘State of C.G. vs. Surendra Sahu and others’ pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class,

¶27

3 / 3

¶28

Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa, CG, in the ends of justice.”

¶29

At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 has pointed out that out of 08 prosecution witnesses, 04^th statement is being recorded as on today.

¶30

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the Respondent No.2, we do not find any good ground for quashing of the FIR bearing No.64/2023, registered at police station Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa, C.G. for commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A, 506 read with 34 of IPC; the charge-sheet bearing No.72/2023 dated 05/04/2023; order framing charge passed on 03.11.2023; and the proceedings of Criminal Case No.95/2023, as the trial is in progress.

¶31

Accordingly, the instant CRMP is dismissed.

¶32

SD/- SD/-

¶33

(Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha)

¶34

Judge Chief Justice

¶35

ashu

Surendra Sahu @ Golu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Sahu @ Golu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishvanath @ Raju Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rampukar Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Atish Meshram Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Badal Vishwas Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Akash Kosare Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shrawan Kumar Rawte Vs State of Chhattisgarh