Anil Sharma v. Shri Remijius Ekka

Chhattisgarh HC10 Apr 2025CONT/359/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; CONT No. 359 of 2025 (2025:CGHC:16958); decided 11/04/2025 by Justice Bibhu Datta Guru; contempt petition by Anil Sharma against Remijius Ekka and Rakesh Jaiswal (Urban Administration and Development); enquiry completed 2013 & 2020; anticipatory pension and arrears granted; gratuity withheld; contempt petition disposed, rule discharged; liberty to petitioner to seek gratuity from appropriate authority; Ankush Soni, Advocate for petitioner; none for respondents.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition disposed of; rule discharged; liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority for grant of gratuity. ¶¶20

Anil Sharma Vs Shri Remijius Ekka — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

1 / 2

2025:CGHC:16958

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

CONT No. 359 of 2025

¶6

1 - Anil Sharma S/o Late Shri B.M. Sharma Aged About 65 Years R/o C- 88, Yadunandan Nagar, Tifra, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - Shri Remijius Ekka Director, Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Block-4, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

2 - Shri Rakesh Jaiswal Joint Director, Office Of The Joint Director, Urban Administration And Development, Bilaspur Zone, Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶11

... Respondents

¶12

(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)

¶13

For Petitioner	: Mr.Ankush	Soni,Advocate
For Respondents	: None

¶14

(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU)

¶15

Order on Board

¶16

11/04/2025

¶17

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that as far as the direction towards the completion of the enquiry within a period of four months is concerned, by filing reply on behalf of the

¶18

2 / 2

¶19

respondents/ Contemnor, it has been stated that the enquiry has already been completed in the year 2013 & 2020. In respect of payment of anticipatory pension and arrears of the said pension is concerned, the same has also been granted. He further submits that as far as the gratuity is concerned, in spite of the conclusion of the enquiry, they are not releasing the same. Hence, the petitioner is seeking a liberty to approach the appropriate authority for grant of gratuity.

¶20

In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is disposed of and the rule is discharged. However, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority for grant of gratuity.

¶21

Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE

¶22

$. Bhilwar

Anil Sharma v. Shri Remijius Ekka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Sharma v. Shri Remijius Ekka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Kumar Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pokhraj Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bahadur Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kalavati Patel Vs Gaurishankar Patel

Bisen Kumar Verma Vs Smt. Alarmalmangai D.

Peetambar Singh Vs Siddharth Komal Pardeshi