Single bench order where the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed multiple consolidated writ petitions filed by various public employees and education seekers as infructuous on the ground of efflux of time, dismissing all substantive claims without scrutiny.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 10
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 6081 of 2016
Versus
WPS No. 1160 of 2020
---- Petitioner
Versus
Page 2 of 10
WPS No. 1290 of 2021
Versus
WPS No. 1837 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 1844 of 2019
Page 3 of 10
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 4481 of 2020
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 5010 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Page 4 of 10
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 5637 of 2022
---- Petitioner
Versus
WPS No. 5767 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 6007 of 2021
Page 5 of 10
---- Petitioner
Versus
WPS No. 6321 of 2021
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 6513 of 2021
---- Petitioner
Versus
Page 6 of 10
---- Respondent
WPS No. 6881 of 2021
---- Petitioner
Versus
WPS No. 6895 of 2021
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 7129 of 2018
Page 7 of 10
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 7154 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 7160 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 7247 of 2018
Page 8 of 10
Versus
WPS No. 7597 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
WPS No. 8564 of 2022
---- Petitioner Versus
Page 9 of 10
Gariyaband (C.G.)
| ---- Respondent |
|---|
WPS No. 8569 of 2022
| ---- Petitioner | |
|---|---|
| Versus |
---- Respondent
WPC No. 1821 of 2018
| ---- Petitioner | |
|---|---|
| Versus |
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. C.J.K. Rao, Advocate
Page 10 of 10
For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. Govt. Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Ms. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyers For CEO, J(P) : Mr. Ved Chandrakar, Advocate (in WPS No. 6007/2021)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
21.06.2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with the efflux of time the writ petitions have become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the writ petitions (s) are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge
Deshmukh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether writs filed by various service seekers have become infructuous due to efflux of time.
Whether the petitioners were entitled to any relief against the State regarding their service matters.
Various Petitioners
State Of Chhattisgarh
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
