The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition by following a previous judgment in Faguvaram Patel, allowing the petitioner to make a representation for remaining grievances and granting liberty regarding leave encashment.
Petitioner granted liberty to make representation for remaining grievances other than leave encashment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 1672 of 2021
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Vinod Kumar Deshmukh, Advocate For State : Mr. Aman Tamboli, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
20.06.2024
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge
Bhumika
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant writ petition should be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed in Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of ChhattisgarhFollowed¶2
Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)]
Kiran Kumar Vishal
State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
