Vinod Kumar Mishra and Ors. v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WPS No. 79 of 2015; Vinod Kumar Mishra and 80 other petitioners versus State of Chhattisgarh (Secretary, Home Department), Director General of Police, Asst. Director General of Police (Accountent), Commandant 12th Battalion Chhattisgarh Arms Force Balrampur-Ramanujganj, and Company Commander Unit Ramanujganj; dismissal of writ petition for want of representation / non-prosecution ('no representation ... even in the second round'; petitioners 'lost their interest in pursuing the matter'); interim order dated 14.01.2015 vacated; decided 13.06.2024 by Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey; NAFR-marked order; counsel for State: Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer; no statute or precedent cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners even in the second round and they appear to have lost their interest in pursuing the matter, the present petition is dismissed on this count alone.