Disposed

Smt. Sangeeta Singh v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC11 Feb 2024WPS/637/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition concerning posting after promotion for a school teacher, the High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the matter without merits, granting liberty to submit a representation and directing the District Education Officer to decide within 60 days per department guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to submit representation and direction to relevant authority to consider it within 60 days as per Clause 3 of Guidelines dated 07.02.2022.

Smt. Sangeeta Singh Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2024)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

Writ Petition (S) No.637 of 2024

¶4

Smt. Sangeeta Singh W/o Deepak Singh Aged About 46 Years Occupation - Service, Posted As - In Charge Head Master, Government Primary School - Bulgoan, Block - Ramchandrapur, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh,

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

The Director, Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalaya, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

The Collector, Distt - Balrampur - Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

The District Education OfÏcer, Balrampur, Distt - Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

The Block Education OfÏcer, Balrampur, Distt - Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh,

¶12

---- Respondents

¶13

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶14

For Petitioner : Ms. Nikita Jangde, along with Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate For State : Ms. Sakshi Goyal, P.L.

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel

¶16

Order on Board

¶17

12/02/2024

¶18

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation raising all the grounds as raised in this petition regarding her place of posting after promotion before respondent No.4/concerned

¶19

counselling Committee and upon submission of the said representation, respondent No.4/concerned counselling Committee may be further directed to consider and decide the same as per Clause 3 of the Guidelines issued on 07.02.2022 by the School Education Department, State of Chhattisgarh, within any stipulated period as fixed by this Court.

¶20

Learned State Counsel does not oppose the limited prayer made by learned Counsel for the petitioner.

¶21

In view of the above submissions made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, without going on merits of the case, the present writ petition stands disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation raising all the grounds as raised in this petition regarding her posting before respondent No.4/concerned counselling Committee and upon submission of the said representation, respondent No.4/concerned counselling Committee is further directed to consider and decide the same as per Clause 3 of the Guidelines issued on 07.02.2022 by the School Education Department, State of Chhattisgarh, within a period of ‘ 60 days ’ thereof.

¶22

With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

Sd/(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge

¶24

Prakash

Smt. Sangeeta Singh v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sangeeta Singh v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Champi Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ravi Kumar Tandon Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pawan Kumar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Thaneshwar Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Central Industrial Secutiry Force Commandant Kstpp Pragati Nagar Korba Vs Ram Karan Sharma

Shankar Lal Dewangan Vs the State of Chhattisgarh