Petitioner sought direction for fresh representation on leave encashment claim, citing Faguvaram Patel judgment. Court directed petitioner to submit fresh representation and respondents to decide within 03 months.
Directed petitioner to make fresh representation; respondents to consider claim for leave encashment within 03 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 411 of 2024
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Ashwin Panickar, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Suyashdhar Diwan, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
ORDER ON BOARD
12/ 0 2 /2024
Heard.
2
( Faguvaram Patel and Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others ). He submits that the claim of petitioner has been rejected by respondent No.5 vide Annexure P/3. He further submits that pursuant to the order passed by this Court in WPS No. 6468/2023, he made a representation before the authorities concerned, but in his representation, he has not mentioned the fact that the matter is squarely covered by the order passed in the case of “ Faguvaram Patel ” (supra), therefore, as of now, he prays that he may be permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondent authorities and the respondent/competent authorities may be directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner in the light of order passed by this Court in the case of “ Faguvaram Patel ” (supra) in accordance with relevant rules and law.
Sd/(Arvind Singh Chandel) JUDGE
ved
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can be permitted to make a fresh representation regarding leave encashment claim in light of the ruling in Faguvaram Patel
Whether the claim of the petitioner should be considered by respondents based on the order passed in Faguvaram Patel
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WPS No. 3870/2021Referred¶20
WPS No. 6468/2023Referred¶22
Faguvaram Patel and Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and othersReferred¶20
Faguvaram Patel and Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others
Shankar Lal Dewangan
The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department
The Engineer In Chief, Public Health Engineering Department
The Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department
The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department
The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
