Goverdhan Sahani Vs State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1 / 3

¶2

2024:CGHC:35954

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 5686 of 2024

¶6

1 - Goverdhan Sahani S/o Shri Hari Singh Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Pujaripal, Tahsil Chhindgarh, Distt. Sukma, C.G.

¶7

2 - Rukhmani Markam W/o Shri Man Sai Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Chikarpal, PostPakel, Tahsil Chhindgarh, Distt. Sukma, C.G.

¶8

3 - Pushplata W/o Shri Laxminath Aged About 32 Years R/o Village And Post Kanjipani, Tahsil Chhindgarh, Distt. Sukma, C.G.

¶9

4 - Smt. Shanti Manjhi W/o Shri Parmeshwar Manjhi Aged About 31 Years R/o Village And Post Kanjipani, Tahsil Chhindgarh, Distt. Sukma, C.G.

¶10

5 - Vasudev Markam S/o Shri Hirmaram Markam Aged About 34 Years R/o Village And Post Urmapal, Distt. Sukma, C.G. 6 - Pankaj Kumar Dhruw S/o Late Shri Shyam Lal Dhruw Aged About 32 Years R/o Village And Post Chhindgarh, Tahsil And Distt. Sukma, C.G. 7 - Bindeshwari Markam W/o Shri Dinesh Markam Aged About 30 Years R/o Village And Post Chhindgarh, Distt. Sukma, C.G.

¶11

8 - Sushila Pujari W/o Shri Benda Potti Aged About 30 Years R/o Village And Post Dornapal, Tahsil And Distt. Sukma, C.G.

... Petitioners

versus

2 / 3

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Tribal And Schedule Caste Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, C.G.

¶16

3 - Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Office, Sukma, District- Sukma, C.G.

¶17

4 - Block Education Officer Chhindgarh, Distt. Sukma, C.G.

¶18

... Respondents

¶19

For Petitioners : P. Chetan Kumar, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Dy. G.A.

¶20

{(Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput})

¶21

Order on Board

¶22

13.09.2024

¶23

Heard.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition may be disposed of permitting the petitioner to make a detailed representation to respondents No.3 & 4/competent authority for the grievances projected in the writ petition, respondents No.3 & 4/competent authority may be directed to consider and decide the same within the reasonable period of time in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner.

¶25

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶26

Be that as it may, after considering the submissions made by the both the parties at bar and on perusal of the documents available on record, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, permitting the petitioner to make a

¶27

3 / 3

¶28

detailed representation before the respondents No.3 & 4/competent authority projecting all his grievances as projected in this writ petition along with the copy of petition within 30 days from today and in turn respondents No.3 & 4/competent authority is expected to consider and decide the same within the period of 120 days from submission of such representation in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner.

¶29

If any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, he may avail the remedy available under the law.

¶30

This Court does not express anything on the merits of this case.

¶31

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions.

¶32

Certified Copy as per rules.

¶33

Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE

¶34

Abhigya.S

Goverdhan Sahani v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Goverdhan Sahani v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siddhi Rathore Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Faguram Satnami Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shri Shivbharosh Ram Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Khooblal Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kaptan Singh Vs Sub Area Manager

Ghanshyam Shandilya Vs State of Chhattisgarh