Dr Sandip Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed as having become infructuous. No substantive proposition of law was laid down.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous
The petition was dismissed as having become infructuous. No substantive proposition of law was laid down.
Petition dismissed as infructuous
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 5650 of 2018
Dr Sandip Kumar S/o Ram Kumar Aged About 34 Years R/o Nishad Para, Agesara, Post Arkar Ward No. 4, Agesara, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner.
Versus
CAUSE TITLE DOWNLOADED FROM CIS PERIPHERY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant : Ms. Laxmin Kashyap on behalf of Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, GA.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board
24.01.2024
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that this petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Ajay
Dr Sandip Kumar
State Of Chhattisgarh
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court