This order corrects a clerical error in a prior order (dated 04.05.2023) pertaining to a writ petition concerning service matters, where the applicant's lawyer was mistakenly recorded as representing the wrong party.
Order dated 04.05.2023 read to show counsel representing respondents 2, 3, and 4 instead of respondent 6.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No.562 of 2023
---- Applicants
Versus
---- Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicants: Mr.Tushar Dhar Diwan, Advocate For Respondents No.1 to 3: Mr.Vinay Paneey, Dy.A.G.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice and Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, Judge
Order on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
24.01.2024
2
No.659/2018 before this Court to direct the department concern to take action against respondent No.6 namely Mohd. Akram and to direct Department concern to consider the complaints/letters of the petitioner / complainant in the light of such complaint and looking to the previous criminal record of respondent No.6 (respondent No.4 herein) he may be removed from job.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice
Bablu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 04.05.2023 in WP Cr.P No. 659 of 2018 requires correction regarding the marking of the applicant's counsel as counsel for respondent No. 6.
Director General, Door Darshan Kendra, Raipur And Others
State of Chhattisgarh And Others
Ramesh Sinha
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
