The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking relief in promotion and seniority matters. The court directed the respondent authorities to convene the Departmental Promotion Committee within six months.
Direction to convene the DPC and take a decision within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.394 of 2024
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Faisal Akhtar, Advocate For State : Mr. Suyashdhar Diwan, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
Order on Board
19/02/2024
“10.1. The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority for preparation of the seniority list for the post of Executive Engineer showing the seniority for all subsequent years.
10.2. The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority the DPC to be conveyed for the promotion to the post of Superintendent Engineer as per rules.
2
10.3. Grant any other writ(s), order(s), relief(s) in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon’ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.”
CC as per rules.
Sd/(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Abhigya.S
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent authority should convene the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for promotion to the post of Superintendent Engineer.
Whether a direction should be issued for the preparation of a seniority list for the post of Executive Engineer.
P.R. Fulekar
State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Water Resources Department
Engineer-In-Chief Water Resources Department
Chief Engineer, Mini Mata Bango Project
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
