Disposed¶22

Dilip Kumar Bareth v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC14 Jun 2024WPS/3589/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Teacher Panchayat (Librarian) recruitment 2013 Janjgir-Champa left unconcluded; State Government stay letters dated 25.4.2014 and 11.8.2015; direction dated 30.6.2018 withdrew recruitment from Zila Panchayat to School Education Department; affidavit of CEO Zila Panchayat pursuant to order dated 16.7.2021 in WPS No.2097/2015; no further direction issued; petitioners at liberty to question the letters; both writ petitions disposed of, no costs; WPS No. 3589 of 2015; decision 15.06.2024; Judge Rakesh Mohan Pandey; petitioners Dilip Kumar Bareth and Muni Ram Rathore.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; petitioners left with liberty to question the State Government letters dated 25.4.2014 and 11.8.2015 in accordance with law; no order as to cost(s). ¶22

Dilip Kumar Bareth Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

-1-

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 3589 of 2015

¶5

1. Dilip Kumar Bareth S/o Batto Lal Bareth, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Kadari, P S Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.

¶6

2. Muni Ram Rathore, S/o Late Heerasagar Rathore, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Jharna, Via. Baradwar, P S Baradwar, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.

¶7

---- Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

2. The Additional Chief Secretary, State of Chhattisgarh, Department of Finance, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

---- Respondents

¶13

(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)

¶14

For Petitioners : Ms. Zainab Vanak, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For State : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Additional Advocate General

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board

¶16

15.06.2024

¶17

1. The petitioners have filed this writ petition stating inter alia that though recruitment for the post of Teacher Panchayat (Librarian) was completed in the year 2013 in which the petitioners have been appeared, but further proceeding has not been concluded and therefore, they could not be appointed.

¶18

1. On 16.7.2021, the Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court in WPS/2097/2015, directed the Chief Executive Officer, Panchayat, Janjgir Champa to file affidavit. Pursuant to the order dated 16.07.2021, Affidavits have been filed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila

¶19

-2-

¶20

Panchayat, Janjgir Champa stating inter alia that though recruitment was held for the post of Teacher Panchayat (Librarian), but before recruitment could be completed, the State Government has stayed the whole process of recruitment by letter dated 25.4.2014 and dated 11.8.2015 and finally, State Government has issued a direction on 30.6.2018, whereby recruitment process has been withdrawn from Zila Panchayat and recruitment power was given to the School Education Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, as such, recruitment could not be completed for the reasons assigned in these letters.

¶21

1. From perusal of the affidavit filed in an identical matter (WPS No.2097/2015) by the respondents, it is quite vivid that subject recruitment has already been stayed by the State Government by letters dated 25.4.2014 and 11.8.2015 for the reasons assigned therein. In that view of the matter, no further direction can be issued by this Court. However, the petitioners are at liberty to question the letters issued by the State Government on 25.4.2014 and on 11.8.2015 in accordance with law.

¶22

1. With the aforesaid observation, both the writ petitions are accordingly disposed of . No order as to cost(s).

¶23

Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶24

Nadim

Dilip Kumar Bareth v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar Bareth v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Kumar Rai and Ors. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Ramlal And Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Shiv Kumar Tiwari and Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Gaurishankar Soni (Died) Through his Legal Heirs Vs Durg Rajnandgaon Gramin Bank

Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Govind Baghel Vs Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon And Anr.