A single-bench order dismissed two writ petitions seeking extension of superannuation age. The Court held that a coordinate bench had already decided the issue, rendering these petitions infructuous by efflux of time.
Petitions disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 229 of 2013
Versus
1. Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, S/o Through Its Commissioner, Municpal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
2. The State of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretrary, Deptt Of Nagirya Prashashan Avam Vikash Mahanadi Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents
WPS No. 230 of 2013
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon, through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
2. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretrary, Deptt of Nagirya Prashashan Avam Vikash Mahanadi Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents
(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioners : None, even in the 3 rd round. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.2/State : Mr. Satish Gupta, Government Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board
15.06.2024
therefore, these petitions are also disposed of on the same terms.
-2-
extending the age of superannuation.
both the petitioners have superannuated on attaining the age of 60 years and as such
the petitions by efflux of time have become infructuous.
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Nadim
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitions seeking extension of superannuation age should be disposed of as infructuous after a coordinate bench has decided the legal position.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WPS No.640 of 2007 & WP No. 3851 of 2006Referred¶20
Rukhani
Govind Baghel
Municipal Corporation, Rajnandgaon
The State of Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
