“12. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, particularly in the light of Full Bench judgment passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in R.K. Chaturvedi (supra), it is quite clear that once the employee’s revised scale of pay is fixed in accordance with the provisions of Subrule (1) of Rule 7 of the M.P. Revision of Pay Rules, 1990, he can not claim any further benefit of advance increments in the event of his promotion or in the event of payment of higher pay-scale. In the instant case, the petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Grade-III vide order dated 24.01.1992. The wife of the petitioner had undergone family planning operation (Tubectomy) on 29.07.1999. On account of the family planning operation, the benefit of two advance increments has been granted to the petitioner vide order dated 23.08.1999. The petitioner got the above benefit till December, 2004. Subsequently, when vide order dated 19.01.2005, the petitioner was promoted to the post of Assistant Grade-II in the pay scale of Rs.4000-100-6000, two advanced increments granted earlier to him were taken into consideration and accordingly his pay was fixed at the stage where the same reached in the stage of pay scale of promoted post. Since advance increments were already included in the basis pay of this earlier post/pay scale and while fixing his pay on promoted post the said basic (including the advance increments) was taken into consideration and accordingly his pay was fixed, hence there is no question of grant of further advance increment, therefore, we are of the considered opinion that the learned Single Judge while deciding the writ petition
