Dismissed
Ku. Ritu Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWPS/2050/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
What the court decided
AI extract
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2
2024:CGHC:32797
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 2050 of 2015
1 - Ku. Ritu Sahu S/o Shri Bagas Sahu Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Konka, Post Raunda,tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg Chhattisgarh,
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. S/o Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 2 - Tahsildar Dhamdha District Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dhamdha, Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh
5 - Social Education Co-Ordinator Janpad Panchayat Dhamdha, Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 6 - Manju Sahu D/o Shri Kamta Ram Sahu Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Konka, Post Raunda, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner :- Mr. Rakshit Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate For State :- Mr. Vivek Mishra, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 :- Mr. Sushobhit Singh, Advocate For Respondent Nos.3 to 5 :- Ms. Chetna Sharma, Advocate For Respondent No.6 :- Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate
2 / 2
SBHon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
28.08.2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions.
2. In view of the above, as the petitioner’s counsel has no instructions from the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the instant writ petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
@d!t!
Ku. Ritu Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh
Tahsildar Dhamdha
Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dhamdha
Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Durg
Manju Sahu
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court