Abdullah Baig v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition listed for hearing; court issued fresh notice to respondent No.11, with an automatic dismissal clause if process fees and copies were not furnished within seven days.
What did the court decide?
Fresh notice to respondent No.11 ordered; petition to auto-dismiss on non-compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 4139 of 2015
Abdullah Baig versus State Of Chhattisgarh
Order Sheet
| 27.08.2024 | Mr. Aishwary Diwan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ajay Kumar Chandra, Advocate for the petitioner(s). |
|---|---|
| Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State. Heard. |
|
| Issue fresh notice to respondent No.11. P.F. and copies within seven days. It is made clear that in case of non-compliance of the said order, this writ petition would automatically stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. |
|
| @d!t! | Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge |
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Abdullah Baig
- respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh
Coram
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPS/4139/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court