The court disposed of the instant writ petition by relying on the binding precedent set in Faguvaram Patel from this Court, treating the instant matter as governed by the same judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 3154 of 2024
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
20.06.2024
Page 2 of 2
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Bhumika
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)]Relied on¶20
Radheshyam Sahu S/o Bharat Sahu
Rajendra Prasad Sao S/o Late Saryu Prasad Sao
Ramgopal Shrivas S/o Ramadhar Shrivas
Pitambar Singh Rajpur S/o Late Phool Singh Rajput
Radheshyam Rathore S/o Late Anand Ram Rathore
Devi Prasad Tiwari S/o Late Makhan Prasad Tiwari
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
