Dismissed
Umashankar Sao v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh HCWPS/1133/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as counsel stated it had become infructuous with the passage of time.
What the court decided
AI extract
Writ petition dismissed as counsel stated it had become infructuous with the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 1133 of 2017
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate. For State : Mrs. Shailaja Shukla, Dy. Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board
13-06-2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition (s) is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge
Raju
Umashankar Sao
State of Chhattisgarh
The Director/Additional Director Finance, Directorate, Department of Urban Administration And Development
The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, New Baradwar
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court