Petitioners challenged an impugned order rejecting leave encashment claims. The Court found that the leave encashment had already been paid by the respondents, rendering adjudication unnecessary, and disposed of the writ petition without further relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 2467 of 2024
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : None For State : Mrs. Shailja Shukla, Dy. Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
12.06.2024
Page 2 of 2
respondent No. 5 Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering (PHE) Department Division Raigarh, District : Raigarh (C.G.) has rejected the claim of petitioner for grant of leave encashment.
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge
Manish
Prem Shankar Pandey
Chhattar Singh Sidar
State of Chhattisgarh
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
