Appeal on board where the petitioner sought a direction to the competent authority to decide a pending representation within 90 days. The court disposed of the petition with this direction, which was not opposed by the State.
Direction to Respondents No. 3 to 5 to decide the petitioner's representation within 90 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 1109 of 2024
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : Mr. Jai Prakash Shukla, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Sakshi Goyal, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
ORDER ON BOARD
21/ 0 2 /2024
Heard.
2
within a stipulated period as fixed by this Court.
Sd/(Arvind Singh Chandel) JUDGE
ved
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the competent authority should consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner within 90 days.
Krishna Kant Pandey
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education
Director Directorate Of Public Education
Collector Baikunthpur
Joint Director (Education) Surguja Division Ambikapur
District Education Officer Baikunthpur
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
