Dismissed¶28

C.g. State Warehousing Corp. v. Smt. Chitrarekha and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC15 Oct 2024WPL/145/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal permitted; Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation; Uttam Kumar Sahu; Smt. Chitrarekha; Labor Court-I Raipur; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; private respondents already working pursuant to Labor Court order; NAFR; decided on 16/10/2024; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petitions; petitions dismissed as withdrawn. ¶28

C.g. State Warehousing Corp. Vs Smt. Chitrarekha and Ors. — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

1 / 2

2024:CGHC:40624

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPL No. 146 of 2012

¶6

1 - Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Croporation. 22 Anand Nagar, Raipur C.G., through its Managing Director

¶7

---- Petitioner

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - Uttam Kumar Sahu, S/o Bisoha, Ward No. 2, Sandi Road, Post Ahirwa, District (C.G.)

¶10

2 - Labour Court-I (under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947), Raipur (C.G.), through its Presiding Officer.

¶11

3. Deputy Commissioner (Labour), Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

---- Respondents

¶13

WPL No. 145 of 2012

¶14

Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation, 22 Anand Nagar, Raipur (C.G.), Through its Managing Director

¶15

---- Petitioner

¶16

Versus

¶17

1 - Smt. Chitrarekha , W/o Mahesh Singh Ahiwara, Ward No. 5, Subhash Chowk, Nandini Mines, Durg (C.G.)

¶18

2- Labour Court -I (under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947), Raipur C.G. Through Its Presiding Officer

¶19

2 / 2

¶20

3 - Deputy Commissioner (Labour), Chhattisgarh, Raipur (CG)

¶21

---- Respondents

¶22

For Petitioners	: Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate.
For Respondent	: Ms. Dyna Bajrang, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vinod
No. 1	Deshmukh,
For Resp. /State	: Mr. AmandeepSingh, Panel Lawyer.

¶23

(Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)

¶24

Order on Board

¶25

16/10/2024

¶26

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that he may be permitted to withdraw these petitions, as private respondents are already working with the petitioner – Department in pursuance of the order passed by the Labour Court.

¶27

He is permitted to do so.

¶28

Accordingly, writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶29

Sd/(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

¶30

Amit

¶31

AMIT Digitally signedby AMIT KUMAR KUMAR DUBEYDate: DUBEY 2024.10.1810:45:13 +0530

C.g. State Warehousing Corp. v. Smt. Chitrarekha and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.g. State Warehousing Corp. v. Smt. Chitrarekha and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kamini Yaduraj Vs Shri Rishabhdev Yaduraj

Ramsahay Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Naresh Ekka Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Satyavati Yadav Vs Munnalal Agrawal

Sandeep Kumar Sonkar Vs Ramgopal

C.g. State Warehousing Corp. Vs Uttam Kumar Sahu and Or.s