Dismissed

Sandeep Kumar Sonkar v. Ramgopal

Chhattisgarh HC15 Oct 2024WP227/923/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition challenging an interlocutory order on plaintiffs' application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. Counsel sought liberty to file appeal; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with that liberty.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file appropriate appeal against the order dated 22.01.2024.

Sandeep Kumar Sonkar Vs Ramgopal — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Chhattisgarh HC (2024)

1 / 2

2024:CGHC:40541

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WP227 No. 923 of 2024

¶6

Sandeep Kumar Sonkar, S/o Shri Gopi, Aged About 27 Years, Caste Sunkar, R/o H 30, Civil Ward P.W.D. Colony, Tahsil & District Damoh, Madhya Pradesh (Defendant No.6). ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. Ramgopal, S/o Venkat, Aged About 56 Years, Caste Tali, R/o Village Saindha, P.S. Podi, Tahsil Manendragarh, District M.C.B., (C.G.) (Plaintiff No.1).

¶9

2. Abhimanyu, S/o Venkat, Aged About 38 Years (Died) Through Legal Heirs Nil 2a. Fumani Sahu, W/o Late Abhimanyu, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Sendha, P.S. Podi, District Korea Now District M.C.B., Chhattisgarh. 2b. Rinki Sahu, D/o Late Abhimanyu, Aged About 4 Years, Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Fumani Sahu, W/o Late Abhimanyu, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Sendha, P.S. Podi, District Korea Now District M.C.B., Chhattisgarh.

¶10

2c. Kanti Sahu, D/o Late Abhimanyu, Aged About 2 Years, Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Fumani Sahu, W/o Late Abhimanyu, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Sendha, P.S. Podi, District Korea Now District M.C.B., Chhattisgarh.

¶11

DEEPTIJHANIRALA Digitallysigned byDEEPTIJHANIRALADate:2024.10.1616:53:56+0530

¶12

3. Musammat Geeta, W/o Vishnu, Aged About 36 Years, Caste Teli, R/o Village Bardar, P.S. Khadgawa, Tahsil Khadgawa, District M.C.B., Chhattisgarh. - (Plaintiff No.3).

¶13

4. Indramani Thakur, W/o Shri Netlal Thakur, Aged About 40 Years, Caste Nai, R/o Ward No.15, Bhulsikala, Tahsil Kusmi, District Balrampur, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No.3)

¶14

5. Abdul Karim, S/o Shri Abdul Rahim, Aged About 55 Years, Caste Behna, R/o Nagpur, P.S. Podi, Tahsil Manendragarh, District M.C.B., Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 4).

¶15

6. Jibael Alag, S/o Shri Rasul Miya, Aged About 60 Years, Caste Momin, R/o Ward No.40, Nehru Colony Chirmiri, District M.C.B., Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 5).

¶16

7. Mahelaka Siddiqui, W/o Shri Rahat Hussain, Aged About 31 Years, Caste Shekh, R/o 13 Railway Fatak, Napur. P.S. Podi, Tahsil Manendragarh, District M.C.B., Chhattisgarh. (Defendant No.7).

¶17

8. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Through Chief Regional Manager, Vyapar Vihar Road, Bajpai Peliya, First Floor, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No.8).

¶18

9. Anirudh, S/o Venkat, Aged About 40 Years, Caste Teli, R/o Village Sendha, P.S. Podi, Tahsil Manendragarh, District M.C.B, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No.1).

¶19

10. State Of Chhattisgah, Through Collector, Baikunthpur, District Korea, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No.2). ... Respondents

¶20

(Cause title taken from Case Information System)

¶21

2 / 2

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr. Ramsevak Soni, Advocate. For State/Respondent No.10 : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, P.L.

¶23

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board

¶24

16/10/2024

¶25

1. Heard.

¶26

2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, with liberty to file appropriate appeal against the Order dated 22.01.2024, so far as it relates to the application filed by the plaintiffs under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

¶27

3. Permission is granted.

¶28

4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶29

Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge

Sandeep Kumar Sonkar v. Ramgopal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Kumar Sonkar v. Ramgopal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kamini Yaduraj Vs Shri Rishabhdev Yaduraj

Ramsahay Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Naresh Ekka Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Satyavati Yadav Vs Munnalal Agrawal

C.g. State Warehousing Corp. Vs Uttam Kumar Sahu and Or.s

C.g. State Warehousing Corp. Vs Smt. Chitrarekha and Ors.