Smt. Mayurika Pandey and Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

¶1

1

¶2

2024:CGHC:43645

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 864 of 2015

¶6

1 - Smt. Mayurika Pandey W/o Rajnish Pandey Aged About 31 Years R/o Ward No. 11, Bodri Chakabhatha Po Chakarbhatha Camp Police Station Chakarbhatha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

¶7

2 - Smt. Chandraprabha Devi Pandey W/o Ranjeet Pandey Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No. 11, Bodri Chakabhatha Po Chakarbhatha Camp Police Station Chakarbhatha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

¶8

... Petitioners

¶9

versus

¶10

NARESHKUMAR Digitallysigned byNARESH KAMDE KUMARKAMDE

¶11

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

¶12

2 - The Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

¶13

3 - Sub Divisional Officer Revenue Cum - Land Acquisition Officer, Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

¶14

4 - The Defence And Estates Officer, Jabalpur Circle, Jabalpur Kent, District Jabalpur Madhya Pradesh

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

For Petitioners : Shri Harshmandar Rastogi, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate.

¶17

For the State/Resp. : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Govt. Advocate. No. 1 to 3

¶18

Hon’ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

2

Order on Board

08/11/2024

By the present writ petition the petitioners are claiming ownership over the land. Both the petitioners are relatives. The petitioner No.1 namely Smt. Mayurika Pandey is having land bearing Khasra No.17/2 and 17/4, admeasuring area 1.70 and 0.30 acres in total 2.00 acres situated at village Tilsara, Tahsil & Block Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.), the petitioner No.2 namely Smt. Chandraprabha Pandey is having land bearing Khasra No.17/3 and 18/4, admeasuring area 2.50 and 0.50 acres in total 2.00 acres situated at village Tilsara, Tahsil & Block Bilha, District Bilaspur (C.G.), whose lands were acquired by way of the award dated 10/05/2013 (Annexure-P/6) by the Land Acquisition Officer/Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) seeking the following relief :-

¶23

“10.1 award dated 10.05.2013 (Annexure-P/6) passed in land acquisition proceedings initiated under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in Land Acquisition Case No. 13/A82/2011-12 may be declared as lapsed and respondents may be directed to proceed in accordance with the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if for granting/fixing compensation.”

¶24

The main ground which the petitioners are seeking that the Land Acquisition Proceeding be declared as lapsed, though the award has been passed under the old Act i.e. Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but the possession of the land in question, has been taken on 09/01/2014. He referred the provision of Section 24 (2) of the New Act Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, which reads as under :-

¶25

3

¶26

“24 (2) Notwithstanding anything contained i9n subsection (1), in case of land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, where an award under the said Section 11 has been made five years or more prior to the commencement of this Act, but the physical possession of the land has not been taken or the compensation has not been paid the said proceeding shall be deemed to have been lapsed and the appropriate Government, if it so chooses, shall initiate the proceedings of such land acquisition afresh in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

¶27

Provided that where an award has been made and compensation in respect of majority of land holdings has not been deposited in the beneficiaries, then, account all of the beneficiaries specified in the notification for acquisition under Section 4 of the said land acquisition act, shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with the provisions of this Act."

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as the physical possession of the land has not been taken, the proceeding of land acquisition be declared as lapsed.

¶29

Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the provision of Section 24 (2) of the Act will not attract or applicable in case of the petitioners because the award has been passed on 10/05/2013 and the amount of compensation has been paid on 09/01/2014 and possession has also been taken on 09/01/2014. She referred the reply submitted by the State in paragraph 7 & 8.

¶30

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record.

¶31

It is not in dispute that, the award has been passed on 10/05/2013 by the Land Acquisition Officer in the Land Acquisition Case No. 13/A82/2011-12. After the award of compensation amounting to Rs.20,04,373/- and Rs.20,04,031/- have also been paid to the

¶32

4

¶33

petitioners on 09/01/2014 vide Cheque No. 296353 and 296351 dated 09/01/2014 respectively (Annexure-R/6). Further a copy of the letter of possession has been annexed by the respondent-State by which the petitioners handed over the possession of the land to the Estate Officer, Department of Defence, Jabalpur through Land Acquisition Officer, dated 09/01/2014 (Annexure-R/7). Hence, the petitioners’ contention, that as the physical possession of the land has not been taken from the petitioners and in view of the same the land acquisition proceeding be declared as lapsed cannot be acceptable as the petitioners themselves have given the possession to the Estate Officer, Department of Defence, Jabalpur through Land Acquisition Officer on 09/01/2014 and compensation has also been paid to the petitioners on 09/01/2014. The provision of Section 24 (2) of the Act will not be attracted applicable in the case of the petition. The petitioners are not entitle for any relief as sought for in the present writ petition.

¶34

Hence the writ petition filed by the petitioners without any substance and deserves to be and is hereby dismissed.

¶35

Sd/-

¶36

(Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE

¶37

Kamde

Smt. Mayurika Pandey and Anr. v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Mayurika Pandey and Anr. v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Golsai Gond Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Santosh Namdev Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Shyam Naresh Vaishnav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mahendra Kumar Nathhani Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Girja Prasad Mahar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Yogesh Mishra (Peti. in Person) Vs State of Chhattisgarh