Arjundas v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner in writ petition failed to appear in court on two occasions. The single bench dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution without deciding the merits of the case.
Petitioner in writ petition failed to appear in court on two occasions. The single bench dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution without deciding the merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No.614 of 2016
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause title is taken from C.I.S. )
Present:-
None for the petitioner, even when the matter was called twice. Shri Kishan Lal Sahu, Dy.GA for the State/respondent No.1. None for other respondents, though served.
Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal
Order On Board
2
24.01.2024
SD/(Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge
Tumane
Arjundas S/o Shri Gopaldas
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur
The Dy. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur
Officer In Charge Market Department, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur
Bhojraj Narwani
Sanjay S. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court