Smt. Seema Pathak v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WPC No. 2121 of 2014; Seema Pathak v. State of Chhattisgarh; writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; non-appearance/no representation by petitioner; respondents included Commissioner Sonmani Bora, Regional Transport Authority Bilaspur Division, Secretary RTA, Transport Department, and private respondent Smt. Nilima Dubey (counsel Shri Pankaj Agrawal); Panel Lawyer Ms. Isha Jajodia for State; single bench Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad; decision date 13/11/2024; digitally signed by Gopal Singh; order tagged NAFR; no statute or precedent cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
As no one appeared on behalf of the Petitioner and there was no representation on her behalf, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶¶24