Dismissed
Lanco Amarkantak Power Ltd. v. Union of India
Chhattisgarh HCWPC/193/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed after petitioner's counsel pleaded no instruction.
What the court decided
AI extract
Writ petition dismissed after petitioner's counsel pleaded no instruction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 193 of 2018
Lanco Amarkantak Power Ltd. Having Its Registered Office At Plot No. 4, Software Units Layout, Hitec City, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana Project Office- Village Pathadi, Post Office Tilkeja District Korba Chhattisgarh-495674 Represented By Shri Sanjay Kumar Bhardwaj, Authorized Signatory, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Devershi Tiwari, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Shailendra Shukla, Advocate For Union of India : Ms. Anmol Sharma, Central Government Counsel For Respondent No.2 : Mrs. Astha Shukla, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board
24.04.2024
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Rekha
Lanco Amarkantak Power Ltd.
Union of India
Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd.
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court