Dismissed

Sushil Kumar Gupta v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC1 Apr 2024WPC/1842/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought withdrawal of a writ petition concerning a revenue matter to pursue restoration before the Tehsildar under the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code; the court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw with liberty to move restoration application before the Tehsildar under the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code.

Sushil Kumar Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Property and Title | Chhattisgarh HC (2024)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

WPC No. 1842 of 2024

¶4

1. Sushil Kumar Gupta S/o Late Chandrika Prasad Gupat, Aged About 54 Years Caste Bani R/o Pandatarai Ward No. 7, Tahsil- Pandaria, Distt- Kabirdham (C.G.).

¶5

2. Suresh Kumar Gupta S/o Late Chandrika Prasasd Gupta, Aged About 52 Years Caste Bani R/o Pandatarai Ward No. 7, Tahsil- Pandaria, Distt- Kabirdham (C.G.).

¶6

3. Smt. Snehlata Gupta D/o Late Chandrika Prasad Gupta Aged About 50 Years Caste Bani R/o Pandatarai Ward No. 7, Tahsil- Pandaria, Distt- Kabirdham (C.G.).

¶7

4. Smt. Pushplata Gupta D/o Late Chandrika Prasad Gupta Aged About 45 Years Caste Bani R/o Pandatarai Ward No. 7, Tahsil- Pandaria, Distt- Kabirdham (C.G.).

¶8

5. Smt. Shashilata Gupta D/o Latwe Chandrika Prasad Gupta Aged About 40 Years Caste Bani R/o Pandatarai Ward No. 7, Tahsil- Pandaria, Distt- Kabirdham (C.G.).

¶9

6. Smt. Gayatri Devi Wd/o Late Chandrika Gupta, Aged About 76 Years Caste Bani R/o Pandatarai Ward No. 7, Tahsil- Pandaria, Distt- Kabirdham (C.G.). ---- Petitioners Versus

¶10

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through, Collector, Kabirdham,distt- Kabirdham (C.G.).

¶11

2. Sub Divisional Officer( Revenue) Pandariya, Distt- Kabirdham (C.G.).

¶12

3. Tahsildar, Pandariya, Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.). ---- Respondents

¶13

(Cause-title is taken from Case Information System)

¶14

------------------------------ For Petitioners	------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ : Mr. Rajbahadur Singh, Advocate.
For Respondents ------------------------------	: Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P. L. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board

¶15

02.04.2024

¶16

1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to move appropriate application for restoration of the case before concerned Tehsildar in accordance with the provisions of Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code.

¶17

2. Permission granted.

¶18

3. No objection from other side.

¶19

4. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid

¶20

liberty. Certified copy be returned after retaining its xerox copy.

¶21

Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge

¶22

Ajinkya

Sushil Kumar Gupta v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Kumar Gupta v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal Agrawal Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Smt. Manju Sinha Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dipawali Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pushpanchala Chaudhary Vs Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd.

Kalawati Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Chandrika Giri Vs State of Chhattisgarh