Husband's writ petition against wife, pending at final stage before the High Court of Chhattisgarh. Counsel for the petitioner sought permission not to press the petition; the respondent did not oppose. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2
2024:CGHC:34505
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 621 of 2022
... Petitioner
versus
... Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Anchal Kumar Matre, Advcoate. For Respondent : Mr. Rajnish Singh Baghel and Ms. Chetna Sharma, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board
05/09/2024
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition as this matter is at the final stage.
2 / 2
2. Learned counsel for the respondent would not oppose the said limited prayer.
3. In view of the above submission, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge
Priyanka
Mayank Soni
Smt. Ritu Sarraf
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
