Dismissed¶26

I.k.verma And Ors. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC19 Aug 2024WP227/545/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; WP227 No. 545 of 2014; dismissal for want of prosecution; non-representation by petitioners; petitioners I.K. Verma, Yogeshwar Singh Dilliwar, Vishnu Bharti, Hukum Singh Dilliwar, Yuvraj Chandrakar, Domar Verma; respondents State of Chhattisgarh Department of Energy, CSPDCL, C.G. State Electricity Distribution Company; counsel for State/Respondent Shri Pramod Ramteke, PL; decided 20/08/2024 by Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari; no relief granted, no quantum, no precedents engaged.

What did the court decide?

As none appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 25.06.2024 and there was again no representation on the date of hearing, the Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution. ¶26

I.k.verma And Ors. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

1 / 2

2024:CGHC:31542

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WP227 No. 545 of 2014

¶6

1 - I.K.Verma S/o Late Shri Chait Ram Verma Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Funda Post Bori Thana Bori Tehsil Dhamdha Distt. Durg C.G.

¶7

2 - Yogeshwar Singh Dilliwar S/o Sri Bhikham Prasad aged about 38 years R/o Vill Litiya Post Litiya Ps Bori, Tah Dhamdha, Distt Durg, C.G.

¶8

3 - Vishnu Bharti S/o Daya Ram Bharti aged about 48 years Vill Purda Bade, Post Purda, Ps Bori, Tah Dhamdah, Distt Durg, C.G.

¶9

4 - Hukum Singh Dilliwar S/o Bharat Lal Dilliwar aged about 28 years R/o Vill Funda Post Bori Thana Bori, Tah Dhamdha, Distt Durg, CG

¶10

5 - Yuvraj Chandrakar S/o Lt Ram Singh Chandrakar aged about 34 years R/o Vill Funda Po Bori Thana Bori, Tah Dhamdha, Distt Durg, CG

¶11

6 - Domar Verma S/o Bhagwat Prasad Verma Aged About 35 Years R/o Vill Funda Po Bori Thana Bori Tahsil Dhamdha Distt. Durg. C.G.

¶12

... Petitioners

¶13

versus

¶14

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Energy, DKS Bhawan(now Mahanadi Bhawan) Mantralaya, New Raipur District Raipur C.G.

¶15

2 / 2

¶16

2 - C.G. State Electricity Board Managing Director, CSPDCL Vidyut Sewa Bhawan, Daganiya Raipur, Distt Raipur, C.G.

¶17

3 - The Managing Director C.G. State Electricity Distribution Company, Raipur, Distt Raipur, CG.

¶18

4 - The Chief Engineer Raipur Region CSPDCL Raipur District CG. 5 - The Superintendeing Engineer Durg Division CSPDCL Durg, District Durg C.G.

¶19

... Respondents For Petitioners : None. For : Shri Pramod Ramteke, PL.

¶20

State/Respondent

¶21

Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

¶22

Order On Board

¶23

20/08/2024

¶24

1. On 25.06.2024, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶25

1. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution.

¶26

1. Accordingly, the instant Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

(Deepak Kumar Tiwari)

¶29

Judge

¶30

Avinash

I.k.verma And Ors. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

I.k.verma And Ors. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brijmohan Vs Balram Kumar Soni

Iffco Tokiyo General Insurance Company Limited Vs Santosh Kumar Keshari

Pushpa Vs Ramnath

Digambar Prasad Gupta Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rohit Das Manikpuri Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sameer Prakash Maheshwari Vs Akhil Pandey