Pushpa v. Ramnath
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh quashed the order dismissing an application to implead a subsequent purchaser in a suit for declaration and partition of title. The bench directed the lower court to allow the amendment of pleadings.
What did the court decide?
Directed the lower Court to allow the application to implead the proposed subsequent purchaser and amend pleadings.
What the court decided
1 / 3
2024:CGHC:31074
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WP227 No. 164 of 2022
1 - Pushpa D/o Late Jhagru Uraon, W/o Deenalal Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Koilari, P.S. And Tahsil Lundra, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.,
... Petitioner
versus
1 - Ramnath S/o Lalsai Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Chittarpur, P.S. And Tahsil Lundra, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.,
2 - Ghasnin D/o Mangra Uraon Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Chittarpur, P.S. And Tahsil Lundra, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.,
- 3 - Lalsai S/o Shaniram Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Chittarpur, P.S. And Tahsil Lundra, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial Court rightly dismissed the application to implead a subsequent purchaser as a defendant.
Whether the petitioner was permitted to amend pleadings to include the subsequent purchaser after the suit was otherwise filed.
Whether the superior court should quash the impugned order under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pushpa D/o Late Jhagru Uraon
- respondent
Ramnath S/o Lalsai
- respondent
Ghasnin D/o Mangra Uraon
- respondent
Lalsai S/o Shaniram
- respondent
Rameshwar S/o Budhiram
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP227/164/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court