Appellants challenged a Single Judge's decision allowing a writ petition by the third respondent; counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file a review petition, which was granted, and the writ appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Appeal No.192 of 2024
---- Appellants
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Appellants : Mr.C.J.K.Rao, Advocate For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr.R.S.Marhas, Addl.Advocate General
Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
Judgment on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
25.04.2024
2
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice
Bablu
Pitambar Prasad Sidar
Ram Narayan Nag
Vivek Thakur
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Fisheries
Director, Directorate Of Fisheries
Savitri Luxmi Chandrakar
Ramesh Sinha
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
