Applicants sought bail; after arguing briefly, their counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application with liberty to file a fresh application if occasion arose, to which respondents raised no objection.
Permission to withdraw with liberty to file a fresh bail application if occasion so arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. (A) No. 118 of 2024
Both are resident of near Sharda Dairy, Chandi Mandir Road, Shivpara, Ward No. 33, Durg, Tahsil & District – Durg (C.G.)
---- Applicants
Versus
----Non-applicants
For Applicants : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate. For Non-applicant No.1 : Ms. Pragya Pandey, Dy. Govt. Advocate. For Non-applicant No. 2 : Mr. Vijay Chawla, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Order On Board
16.04.2024
1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that he may be permitted to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file fresh bail application, if occasion so arises.
Amit/-
Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge
2
3
Vedurvada Santosh Achari
Vedurvada Rani Soni
State of Chhattisgarh
Prakash Kumar Dewangan
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
