This order rejected third bail applications across three accused individuals in a case involving death during a dispute. The court denied bail citing their active role and identification by witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. No. 1335 of 2024
---- Applicants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through, Police Station – City Kotwali, Baloda Bazar, District : Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.)
----Non-applicant
For Applicants : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Order On Board
16.04.2024
Heard.
1. The applicant/accused No. 1 has preferred this third bail application whereas applicants No. 2 & 3 have preferred this second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for releasing them on regular bail in connection with Crime No. 991/2022 registered at police Station City Kotwali, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Baloda Bazar, for the offence punishable under Sections 342, 294, 323, 427, 325, 147, 148, 149 & 302 of the IPC.
2
3
Sd/-
(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Amit
Judge
4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether applicants entitled to regular bail despite identified role in crime?
Whether principle of parity applicable given few co-accused on bail?
Karan Banjare
Pintu Banjare
Pankaj Banjare
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
