The High Court dispensed bail for three applicants in a cheating case involving a deposit fraud scheme, directing release on bond as they lacked direct role in money handling, while dismissing one applicant's petition as not pressed.
Released on bail on personal bond of Rs.25,000 with one surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4389 of 2024
---- Applicants(in jail)
Versus
---- Respondent
MCRC No. 4165 of 2024
---- Applicant(in jail)
Versus
---- Respondent
MCRC No. 4246 of 2024
---- Applicant(in jail)
Versus
---- Respondent
| ---------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |
|---|---|
| For Applicants | : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate. |
| For Non-applicant/State | : Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. Adv. General. |
Page No.2
S.B.:Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board
23/07/2024
Page No.3
of deposit, as mentioned in their complaint, and further applicants have not accepted the cash amount from any of the complainants. Applicants are in jail since 25.3.2024 & 6.5.2024 hence, they may be enlarged on regular bail.
Page No.4
Nisha
Sd/( Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to three applicants falsely implicated in a cheating case where no direct allegation of money handling exists against them.
Whether the bail application of one applicant should be dismissed as not pressed while others are allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Sahu
Mithlesh Sahu
Tikaram Sahu
Brinda Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
