The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an application for regular bail filed by an accused in a Chhattisgarh Excise Act case. The court rejected the bail plea citing the applicant's criminal antecedents and pending similar cases of 2023.
Bail application dismissed; trial court directed to expedite the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4025 of 2024
Sanjay Pawle S/o Sampat Ram, Aged About 43 Years, Shankar Nagar Industrial Area, Kharmora, Tahsil And District-Korba (C.G.)
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line, Rampur, District Korba (C.G.) ---- Respondent
(Cause title is taken from the CIS)
For Applicant : Shri Vikash Pradhan, Advocate
For Respondent/State : Shri Ankur Kashyap, Dy GA
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board
07.06.2024
Mcrc 4025 of 2024
2
examined. He would further submit that in one case of Chhattisgarh Excise Act which was of the year 2017, and in another case of Arms Act of the year 2019, applicant is acquitted but other four cases under Preventive Action of the Section 107/116 of the CrPC have been drawn against the applicant. Considering the detention period of the applicant, he may be enlarged on bail.
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE
padma
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail given his criminal antecedents and pending cases.
Whether the detention of the applicant justifies enlarging bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sanjay Pawle
State Of Chhattisgarh
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
