Ganesh Ram v. Kriparam Dhobi
Case brief
What is this about?
No other option saw the applicant present in the High Court despite service of special post cards. The application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.C.C. No. 813 of 2017
- Ganesh Ram, S/o Late Bajrang Yadav, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Siddarth Chowk, Tikrapara, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
- ---- Applicant
- Versus
- Kriparam Dhobi S/o Dukhuram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Near Purana Sharab Bhatti, Police Station Tikrapara, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : None present For Respondent : None present ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ganesh Ram S/o Late Bajrang Yadav
- respondent
Kriparam Dhobi S/o Dukhuram
Coram
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCC/813/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court