The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the miscellaneous application as unnecessary, observing it was a duplicate of a matter already restored to a previous number.
Present MCC dismissed as unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2
2024:CGHC:34497
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 756 of 2024
1 - Ankur Bakshi S/o Praveen Kumar Bakshi Aged About 25 Years R/o Qr. No. H-4-B, Irrigation Colony, Balod, District Balod C.G.
2 - Nilesh Kumar Sahu S/o Ganesh Ram Aged About 31 Years R/o Village And Post Singola, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon C.G.
3 - Ajay Kumar Sahu S/o Hemlal Sahu Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Mudpar, Post Surgi, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon C.G.
... Petitioners.
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya, Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G.
2 - Director Directorate Of Agriculture, C.G. Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3 - Divisional Joint Director (Agriculture) Department Of Agriculture, Bastar Division, Jagdalpur C.G.
... Respondents.
2 / 2
For Petitioners : None. For State : Shri Rajeev Bharat, GA.
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
Order On Board
05/09/2024
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
Judge
Avinash
Ankur Bakshi and others
State Of Chhattisgarh and others
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
