Allowed¶23

Rajmangal Chauhan @ Rajendra Chauhan v. Sitaram Bareth

Chhattisgarh HC13 Oct 2024MCC/172/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration of MAC No. 1608 of 2015 dismissed for want of prosecution on 05.01.2024; condonation of 9 days' delay (I.A. No. 1 of 2024); MCC No. 172 of 2024; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Justice Radhakishan Agrawal; order dated 14.10.2024; applicant Rajmangal Chauhan @ Rajendra Chauhan; respondents Sitaram Bareth, legal representatives of Firat Ram Bareth (Lakesh Kumar Bareth, Ramesh Kumar Bareth, Smt. Gayamati Bareth), H.D.F.C. Ergo General Insurance Company Limited; 2024:CGHC:40210.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 9 days in filing the MCC condoned; MAC No. 1608 of 2015 restored to its original number. ¶23

Rajmangal Chauhan @ Rajendra Chauhan Vs Sitaram Bareth — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

2024:CGHC:40210

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

MCC No. 172 of 2024

¶6

Rajmangal Chauhan @ Rajendra Chauhan S/o Shri Laxman Chauhan Aged About 40 Years R/o Quatrter No. 1111 Sector 05, Balco Nagar, P.S. Balco, Teh. And Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh

¶7

... Applicant

¶8

Versus

¶9

1. Sitaram Bareth S/o Shri Firan Lal Bareth Aged About 45 Years R/o Vill. Bardawar Basti, P.S. Bardawar, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶10

2. Firat Ram Bareth Died Through Lrs Nill A. Lakesh Kumar Bareth S/o Late Firat Ram Bareth Aged About 37 Years R/o Main Road Baradwar Basti, P.S. And Tehsil Baradwar, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶11

B. Ramesh Kumar Bareth S/o Late Firat Ram Bareth Aged About 42 Years R/o Main Road Baradwar Basti, P.S. And Tehsil Baradwar, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgar

¶12

C. Smt. Gayamati Bareth W/o Late Firat Ram Bareth Aged About 60 Years R/o Main Road Baradwar Basti, P.S. And Tehsil Baradwar, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶13

3. H.D.F.C. Ergo General Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Manager, H.D.F.C. Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. Raipur Office Devendra Nagar Three Way Chowk Commerce Building Raipur, Insurer Of Vehicle

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

¶16

For Applicant	:	Mr. Shivam Mishra, Advocate
For Respondent No. 1	:	None.
For Respondent No. 2	:	Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate
For Respondent No. 3	:	Ms. Pragya Mishra, Advocate on
		behalf of Mr. N.K. Thakur, Advocate

¶17

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

¶18

Order on Board

¶19

14.10.2024

¶20

1. Heard I.A. No. 1 of 2024, application for condonation of delay in filing the MCC.

¶21

2. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, which is supported by an affidavit is allowed and the delay of 9 days in filing the MCC is hereby condoned.

¶22

3. This is an application for restoration of MAC No. 1608 of 2015 which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 05.01.2024.

¶23

4. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application the same is allowed. MAC No. 1608 of 2015 is directed to restore to its original number.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

( Radhakishan Agrawal ) JUDGE

¶26

Saurabh

Rajmangal Chauhan @ Rajendra Chauhan v. Sitaram Bareth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajmangal Chauhan @ Rajendra Chauhan v. Sitaram Bareth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National Insurance Company Limited Vs Gesbai

Ramesh Kumar Sidar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Shrawan Kumar Dhruv

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs S. K. Mohanti

Maniram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shekhan Tirki Vs Kallu Lohar