The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution due to the absence of the appellants and lack of representation despite twice calling the matter.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SAURABH SAURABH YADAV YADAV Date: 2024.10.15 10:32:33 +0530
2024:CGHC:40207
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MAC No. 637 of 2016
1. Shekhan Tirki S/o S/o Shri Roopsai Tirki, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Paraghati P.S. Dharamjaigarh, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, Revenue And Civil District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
2. Smt. Indro Bai Tirki, W/o Shri Shekhan Tirki, Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Paraghati P. S. Dharamjaigarh, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, Revenue And Civil District Raigarh Chhattisgarh , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
3. Bharat Kumar, Aged About 17 Years Minor Through His Natural Guardian Mother Indro Bai Tirki Appellant No. 01, R/o Village Paraghati P. S. Dharamjaigarh, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, Revenue And Civil District Raigarh Chhattisgarh , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
4. Ku. Sunita Tirki, Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Her Natural Guardian Mother Indro Bai Tirki Appellant No. 01, R/o Village Paraghati P. S. Dharamjaigarh, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, Revenue And Civil District Raigarh Chhattisgarh , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
... Appellants
Versus
1. Kallu Lohar S/o Abu Lohar, aged about 50 years R/o Village: Ratu Road, Pandra, Thana Sukhdeo Nagar, Civil and Revenue District: Ranchi Jharkhand.
2. Dilbagh Singh, S/o Pooran Singh, Through Dashmesh Road Carrier Owner R/o Tatibandha Raipur, Civil and Revenue District: Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Branch Manager, Bhartiya Axa General Insurance Company Limited, 1st Floor, Chawla Complex, Govender Nagar Road, Sai Nagar Road, Raipur, Civil and Revenue District: Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
For Appellants : None. For Respondent No. 1 : None. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : None.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Order on Board
14.10.2024
1. Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellant even when the matter is called twice, therefore, this Court is left with no option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution.
2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
( Radhakishan Agrawal ) JUDGE
Saurabh
Shekhan Tirki
Indro Bai Tirki
Kallu Lohar
Radhakishan Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
