The High Court dismissed the matrimonial appeal in default as the appellant failed to appear despite repeated calls, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the matter due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2
2024:CGHC:46921-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 61 of 2020
Smt. Punam Devi W/o Ramasharya aged about 36 years, Through Rajesh Kumar S/o Late Ramnaresh R/o Village-Hatava (Tiwari Tola) 115 No. Railway Gate Near Bypass Road Bhatani Post Office & Police Station Bhatani (Devariya) (U.P.) Pin-274001
... Appellant
Versus
Ramasharya S/o Late Shivnath Saket Kumar Ravi aged about 45 years, Caste-Dusad (Paswan) R/o Q.No. 01/B, Road No. 29 Sector 06 Bhilai Nagar District Durg, Present Address - Q.No.2/B Road No. 21 Sector 6 Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.)
... Respondent
For Appellant : None. For Respondent : Mr. Shivam Agrawal, on behalf of Mr. Hemant Kumar Agrawal, Advocate.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,J. Hon’ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru,J.
Order on Board
Per Rajani Dubey, J.
28.11.2024
2 / 2
Sd/- Sd/(Rajani Dubey) (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Judge
Uttej
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is liable to be dismissed in default due to appellant's absence and loss of interest?
Smt. Punam Devi
Ramasharya
Rajani Dubey
Bibhu Datta Guru
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
