Disposed

Anil Agency, Industrial Area Tifra Bilaspur (C.G.) v. Ramkumar Miri

Chhattisgarh HC18 Mar 2024CRMP/525/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Complainant sought leave to appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC against an acquittal. The court admitted the petition as arguable, granted leave, directed registration as a regular acquittal appeal, and ordered notice to the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Leave to appeal granted; CRMP to be registered as regular acquittal appeal; notice to respondent returnable within eight weeks.

Anil Agency, Industrial Area Tifra Bilaspur… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Chhattisgarh HC (2024)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

CRMP No. 525 of 2024

¶4

Anil Agency, Industrial Area Tifra Bilaspur (C.G.) Through Partner Anil Kesharwani, S/o Shri Shankarlal Kesharwani, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Gondpara Near Gurudwara, Thana - City Kotwali, District Bilaspur (C.G.),... (Complainant)

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Ramkumar Miri S/o Shri Devdas Miri Aged About 40 Years R/o Maharpur, Thana (Aaraksi Kendra) - Mungeli, District Mungeli (C.G.)

¶8

		---- Respondent
For Petitioner	: Mr. Sumit Shrivastava	, Advocate
For Respondent	: None

¶9

Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge

¶10

Order on Board

¶11

19.03.2024

¶12

Heard on admission.

¶13

Admit.

¶14

The present petition has been filed under Section 378(4) of the CrPC for grant of leave to appeal.

¶15

Petition being arguable is admitted for consideration.

¶16

Perused the impugned judgment and gone through the other material available on record.

¶17

On due consideration, the application is allowed and leave is granted. Registry is directed to register the present Cr.M.P. as regular acquittal appeal.

¶18

After registration of regular appeal, issue notice to respondent, on payment of process fee, as per rules.

¶19

Notice be made returnable within eight weeks.

¶20

List this Acquittal appeal receipt of service report.

¶21

In view of above, the present CRMP stand disposed of.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

(Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge

¶24

Alfiza

Anil Agency, Industrial Area Tifra Bilaspur (C.G.) v. Ramkumar Miri

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Agency, Industrial Area Tifra Bilaspur (C.G.) v. Ramkumar Miri

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish @ Bittu Shrivastava Vs State of Chhattisgarh

J.P. Pandey (Died) Through Lrs. Vs Tarun Kumar Sharma

Dilip Kumar Rathore Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Indusind Bank Limited Vs Smt. Sunita Gupta

Kaluram Vs Teekam

Kapil Chhabra Vs Mohan Pandey