Disposed

Indusind Bank Limited v. Smt. Sunita Gupta

Chhattisgarh HC18 Mar 2024CRMP/524/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bank sought leave to appeal against an acquittal. The court condoned a two-day delay in filing, admitted the petition as arguable, and granted leave to appeal, directing the registry to register the petition as a regular acquittal appeal and issue notice to the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 2 days condoned; leave to appeal granted; petition to be registered as regular acquittal appeal with notice to respondent.

Indusind Bank Limited Vs Smt. Sunita Gupta — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Chhattisgarh HC (2024)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

CRMP No. 524 of 2024

¶4

Indusind Bank Limited Registered Under Companies Act 1956, Office Address Near Ambedkar Chowk, Ambikapur, Dist. Sarguja, C.G. ThroughShri Rajesh, S/o Shri Hukumchand, Aged About 30 Years, Currently Posted As Deputy Legal Manager, At Indusind Bank, Power Of Attorney Holder For Indusind Bank (The Impugned Order Mentions The Name Of Earlier Authorized Personnel Ravi Singh)

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Smt. Sunita Gupta W/o Shri Ashish Gupta Aged About 33 Years R/o Ashish Services, Near Manipur Chowk, In Front Of Hanuman Mandir, P.S. And Tehsil Ambikapur, Dist. Sarguja, C.G.

¶8

---- Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner	: Mr. Shailesh Tiwari, Advocate appears on
	behalf of Mr. Chetan Singh Chauhan , Advocate
For Respondent	: None

¶10

Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge

¶11

Order on Board

¶12

19.03.2024

¶13

Heard on admission as well as I.A. No. 01/2024, an application for condonation of delay.

¶14

Admit.

¶15

On due consideration and for the reasons assigned therein, I am inclined to allow the same. Delay of 2 days is hereby condoned.

¶16

The present petition has been filed under Section 378(4) of the CrPC for grant of leave to appeal.

¶17

Petition being arguable is admitted for consideration.

¶18

Perused the impugned judgment and gone through the other material available on record.

¶19

On due consideration, the application is allowed and leave is granted. Registry is directed to register the present Cr.M.P. as regular acquittal appeal.

¶20

After registration of regular appeal, issue notice to respondent, on payment of process fee, as per rules.

¶21

Notice be made returnable within eight weeks.

¶22

List this Acquittal appeal receipt of service report.

¶23

In view of above, the present CRMP stand disposed of.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

(Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge

¶26

Alfiza

Indusind Bank Limited v. Smt. Sunita Gupta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indusind Bank Limited v. Smt. Sunita Gupta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish @ Bittu Shrivastava Vs State of Chhattisgarh

J.P. Pandey (Died) Through Lrs. Vs Tarun Kumar Sharma

Dilip Kumar Rathore Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Anil Agency, Industrial Area Tifra Bilaspur (C.G.) Vs Ramkumar Miri

Kaluram Vs Teekam

Kapil Chhabra Vs Mohan Pandey