to be the author of the crime by stating that on the date and time of the offence, while she was going to her coaching, in the way, the appellant, who is her relative (Mousa), met her and took her to various places and his house on his motor-cycle and he committed forcible sexual intercourse with her. The victim (PW-01) has also stated that prior to it also, the appellant used to took her to many places, including Bilaspur and used to commit sexual intercourse with her against her will and consent and also used to threatened her. The aforesaid statement of the victim (PW-01) has duly been supported by her mother (PW-02), who reported the matter to the police and lodged FIR (Ex.P/06). Further, the victim (PW-01) was also subjected to lengthy cross-examination, but she remained consistent in her version and, therefore, her testimony appears to be reliable and inspire confidence. Moreover, as per Baramdagi Panchnama (Ex.P/01), the victim (PW-01) was recovered from the possession of the appellant during the course of invetigation. As such, on the basis of aforesaid evidence available on record, the finding recorded by the learned trial Court that the appellant is guilty of having committed sexual intercourse with the victim (PW-01) and further for abduction and threatening her, is strictly in accordance with law. We do not find any illegality or perversity in findings recorded by the learned trial Court and, therefore, the appellant has rightly been held guilty for committing offences under Section 376(2(f)(i) of IPC read with Section 06 of POCSO Act as also under Section 366 & 363 of IPC.
