Disposed¶31

Ku. Neelima Sahu v. Ms. Niharika Barik Singh

Chhattisgarh HC4 Nov 2024CONT/428/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CGHC CONT 428/2024, Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, 05.11.2024, contempt petition disposed as infructuous on applicants' counsel submission (efflux of time); applicants: Neelima Sahu, Devendra Kumar Anant, Vinita Vaishnav, Sangeeta Yadu, Shankar Lal Sahu, Ashwani Kumar Sahu, Jaya Gotekar, Maan Singdh Sahu, Suresh Kumar, Madhvee, Nandu Singh Thakur, Divya Ranoo, Tarini; respondents incl. Secretary Panchayat & Rural Development, Secretary School Education, CEO District Panchayat Durg; counsel Rishikant Mahobia, Jitendra Pali; no statutes/cases cited.

What did the court decide?

The Court disposed of the present contempt petition as having become infructuous, in view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants that due to efflux of time the petition had become infructuous. ¶31

Ku. Neelima Sahu Vs Ms. Niharika Barik Singh — Chhattisgarh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

1 / 2

2024:CGHC:42962

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 428 of 2024

¶5

1 - Ku. Neelima Sahu D/o Shri Jagdish Kumar Sahu, Aged About 34 Years R/o Village- Sohpur, Poste Nipani,ps Gurur, District- Balod (C.G.).

¶6

2 - Devendra Kumar Anant S/o Shri Cr Anant, Aged About 38 Years R/o Village And Post Bhedwon, P.S. Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh- Bilaigarh. (C.G.). Pin. 496450

¶7

3 - Smt. Vinita Vaishnav W/o Shri Prashant Vaishnav Aged About 39 Years R/o Mamta Nagar, Anand Vihar Colony, Street No. 5, Po And Ps Rajnandgaon, DistrictRajnandgaon (C.G.). Pin 491441

¶8

4 - Smt. Sangeeta Yadu W/o Sunil Yadu Aged About 40 Years R/o C/o Shri Nandkumar Yadu, Bhelawadhi, Po- And - Uparawara, Ps Abhanpur, DistrictRaipur (C.G.). Pin. 4993661

¶9

5 - Shankar Lal Sahu S/o Shri Johat Lal Sahu, Aged About 41 Years R/oVillage- Satapara, Post- Kondapar, Tahsil And Thana- Abhanpur, DistrictRaipur (C.G.). Pin493661

¶10

6 - Ashwani Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Dulari Ram Sahu, Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Bindhyasar, Post- Bahatarai (Sakti), Thana Hirri, TahsilTahkhatpur, DistrictBilaspur (C.G.). Pin 495001

¶11

7 - Smt. Jaya Gotekar W/o Praveen Gotekar, Aged About 40 Years R/o Panchsheel Colony, Mamta Nagar, Gali No. 5, Ward No. 17, Rajnandgaon (C.G.). Pin 491441

¶12

8 - Maan Singdh Sahu S/o Shri Bisambhar, Now Aged About 41 Years R/o Nagar Panchayat, Bhakhara, Post- Bhakhara, Tahsil- Kurud, DistrictDhamtari (C.G.).

¶13

9 - Suresh Kumar S/o Kuleshwar Prasad Aged About 37 Years R/o Dimar Chowk, Ward No.3, Post And- Dhamdha, District- Durg (C.G.).

¶14

10 - Ku. Madhvee D/o Shri Jagdish Kumar Sahu, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village -So9hpur, Post - Nipani, Ps- Gurur, District- Balod (C.G.).

¶15

2 / 2

¶16

11 - Nandu Singh Thakur S/o Shri Feruram Baghel, Aged About 34 Years R/o Village- Arjuni Post Gorkapur, Ps- Gunderdehi, District- Balod (C.G.).

¶17

12 - Ku.Divya Ranoo D/o Shir Feruram Baghel Aged About 34 Years R/o Village- Arjuni, Post Gorkapur, Ps. Gunderdehi, District- Balod (C.G.).

¶18

13 - Ku.Tarini D/o Shir Daman Lal Sahu, Aged About 41 Years R/o Ward No. 3, Village And Post- Akhara, Thana Patan Tahsil -Patan District- Durg (C.G.).

¶19

... Applicants

¶20

versus

¶21

1 - Ms. Niharika Barik Singh Secretary , Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Government Of Chhattisgarh. Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.),

¶22

2 - Siddhrath Komal Pardesi, Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, DistRaipur (C.G.).

¶23

3 - Ashwani Dewangan, The Chief Executive Officer, District- Panchayat Durg, District- Durg (C.G.).

¶24

... Respondents

¶25

For Applicants : Mr. Rishikant Mahobia, Advocate

¶26

For Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 : Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate

¶27

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

¶28

Order on Board

¶29

05.11.2024

¶30

Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that due to efflux of time, the present contempt petition has become infructuous.

¶31

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants, the present contempt petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

¶32

Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas)

¶33

Judge

¶34

Bhumika

Ku. Neelima Sahu v. Ms. Niharika Barik Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ku. Neelima Sahu v. Ms. Niharika Barik Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijender Singh Chouhan Vs Akanksha Singh

Smt. Reena Masih Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Advit Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ku. Neha Gupta Vs Smt. Roma Shrivastava

Prem Lal Sahu Vs Smt. Roma Shrivastava

Ratheshwari Thakur Vs Ritu Raj Raghuvanshi