Acquittal appeal listed for orders on office objection regarding maintainability. Counsel for the complainant-appellant sought withdrawal with liberty to pursue other remedies; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
ACQA No. 166 of 2024
---- Petitioner (Complainant)
Versus
---- Respondent
(Non-applicant)
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner/Appellant :- Mr. Sanjeev Verma, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on board
15-04-2024
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
Judge
Aadil
Indrajeet Sen
Smt. Rajshri Sharma
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
