This petition withdrew and was dismissed. No substantive legal principles were articulated as the judgment does not decide any question.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(T) No. 68 of 2023
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
| For Petitioner | : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent No.1/State | : Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. Govt. Advocate. |
| For Respondents No. 2 & 3 | : Mr. Maneesh Sharma, Advocate |
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
27.07.2023
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
vatti
M/s A.R. Traders
State of Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
