Petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move a fresh application before the trial court. The High Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to move a fresh application before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(227) No. 113 of 2023
Both R/o Village- Singhanpur, Station- Patewa, Tahsil and District Mahasamund (C.G.)
---- Petitioners
Versus
(Note: the respondent No. 3 is not mentioned in the impugned order dated 10.01.2023 but is mentioned in the order dated 24.02.2022)
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocate For State : Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, Govt. Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
27.07.2023
2
Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
vatti
Sunderlal Kurre S/o Shri Dularawa Satnami
Anil Kumar S/o Shri Sunderlal Satnami
Smt. Sushma Sori
The Junior Engineer Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited
State of Chhattisgarh
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
