Single judge order dismissing the writ petition due to the absence of the petitioner and a finding that the petitioner had lost interest in the matter due to efflux of time.
The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of absence and loss of interest due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 3189 of 2015
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
(Cause title is taken from Court Information System)
For Petitioner : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Raghavendra Verma, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Order On Board
20.09.2023
Earlier on 05/09/2023, when the matter was listed before this Court, no one appeared on behalf of petitioner to represent him.
Even today, when the matter is called for hearing repeatedly, no one appeared on behalf of petitioner to represent him nor any representation is made in this behalf.
It transpires from the record and prayer made in the petition that the petitioner has no interest in pursuing the matter due to efflux of time.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed on this ground alone.
Sd/( Rajani Dubey ) JUDGE
Ravi Mandavi
Ravishankar Yadav
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
