The High Court observed that the Writ Petition was rendered infructuous and consequently dismissed the petition in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
(Writ Petition (Criminal) No.22 of 2023)
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 22 of 202 3
Birendra Kumar Netam, Son of Late Lachhu Ram Netam, aged about 42 years, Teacher, Resident of Village Kopabeda, Block Makdi, District Kondagaon, (Chhattisgarh)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Ms. Sareena Khan, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer
DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Order on Board
(10.03.2023)
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
petition has rendered infructuous.
Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge
s@if
Birendra Kumar Netam
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Sachin Singh Rajput
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
