The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed an application for withdrawal of a writ appeal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, granting liberty as stated in the application. The judgment is a short order with no substantive legal reasoning.
Writ appeal dismissed as withdrawn; application for withdrawal allowed with liberty as stated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 440 of 2022
Rakesh Kumar Rajak S/o Late Deenbandhu Rajak Aged About 52 Years Head Master Government Primary School Ghuibhavna, Block Lakhanpur, R/o Juna Lakhanpur, District Surguja (C.G.)
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
For Appellant : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Advocate For State : Shri Ashish Tiwari, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput { ORDER ON BOARD
(09/03/2023)
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge
Kamde
Rakesh Kumar Rajak
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Sachin Singh Rajput
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
